Federal Lands
Financial Readiness

Conservatism, State's Rights and Family Values in the West

The Coalition for Government in the West stands behind Utah Conservatives in supporting the natural family as the basic unit of society, and we maintain that children are entitled to growing up in a home with both a mother and a father. Traditional marriage is something that government leaders should work carefully to protect. In Utah and around the West, family issues are of primary importance. We believe marriage between one man and one woman should be respected and valued and that every family should seek strong intergenerational relationships. Part of supporting the traditional family in Utah is making the correct political decisions that let government defer authority to fit parents in the name of personal responsibility and self-governance.

Marriage, Federalism and State's Rights

The federal government has an important role in organizing our great nation, but we strongly believe that Utah family issues and marriages should be left to state lawmakers instead of national politicians. The reason is simple: the U.S. Constitution does not give the federal government power to interfere with state regulation in marriage. True Utah conservatism and a commitment to federalism must mean holding strong to traditional marriage and natural families, regardless of what East Coast pundits, activist judges or liberal politicians believe.

Divorce Shouldn't Be Quick and Easy

One way that Utahns can protect families and the covenant of marriage is to do away with no-fault divorces, which make it too easy to dissolve marriages on a whim. We believe this option weakens the institution of marriage and exposes both adults and their children to a number of problems. For divorced adults, increased poverty and lower standards of living are all too common, and reported rates of life satisfaction are lower.

The welfare of children in quick, no-fault divorce cases is also a primary concern for The Coalition for Government in the West and the Sutherland Institute. Academic research has shown that children from divorced families are more likely to bully or be bullied by their peers, suggesting that these kids have both increased aggression and, simultaneously, too few adults to talk with in their daily lives. These children, on average, also become more vulnerable to drug use, child abuse, physical and psychological illness, crime, suicide, poverty and academic failure.

Believers in no-fault divorces claim that if Utah were to get rid of this option, men and women would be unable to leave troubling and detrimental relationships. However, we can see that the state could end no-fault divorce while still allowing men and women in troubled marriages to divorce as a last resort. No longer could simple "irreconcilable differences" be used as a reason to end marriage. However, men and women in the most problematic marriages could cite from a veritable laundry list of issues as grounds for divorce. They include: abuse, impotence, adultery, willful desertion or neglect, habitual drunkenness, incurable insanity and felony conviction.

It's clear that fortifying marriage is in our nation's best interest, and it should be top of mind for lawmakers. For the sake of Utah families, we cannot afford to radically redefine the institution of marriage as an easy-in, easy-out proposition that can come and go on the whims of selfish individuals.

Faith as a Cornerstone

We can also address Utah family issues by turning to our religious heritage. Like the family, church organizations are civic cornerstones that are a vital to building a successful, prosperous community. Without religious organizations, we are like a collection of frenzied atoms crashing into one another, but never working together. Without these community institutions, self-government is nearly impossible.

This brings to mind our commitment to the Constitution, including the First Amendment protections for religious freedom. However, religious freedom should not mean a complete separation of morality from governance. Instead, we can turn to principles learned from religion to shape our personal moral and political choices, including those about traditional marriage and no-fault divorce. We are rightly free from religious coercion, but should never be free from its influence in our community and our lives.

  • Lands Transfer Would Be A Process, Not A Grab
    December 11, 2014
    This post is a transcript of a 4-minute weekly radio commentary aired on several Utah radio stations. The podcast can be found at the bottom of this post. You’ve probably heard by now that the Utah Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office came out with a report last week detailing the potential impacts of transferring about half of all ...
  • EPA’s proposed carbon rule hits Utah’s most vulnerable hardest
    November 25, 2014
    Carl Graham – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed carbon rule is the latest in a series of regulations that will increase the cost of electricity and natural gas at a time when wages are stagnant and a lot of people are struggling to get by. According to a recently released study, if this new carbon ...
  • American Lands Council Rebuttal to U. of U. TPLA Legal Analysis
    November 13, 2014
      A step by step rebuttal of the U. of U. “analysis,” complete with Lawyer-ese and everything. ALC Legal Rebuttal  
  • The Only One “Seizing” Federal Lands is Uncle Sam
    October 30, 2014
    By Paul Gessing and Carl Graham In a recent New York Times editorial, New Mexico Senator Martin Heinrich asserted that supporters of a transfer of some federal lands to the states are engaged in a “land grab.” He’s not just wrong he’s inverting the truth completely. It is actually the federal government that has “grabbed” New Mexicans’ ...
  • Difference in lands polls explained by education
    October 13, 2014
    by: Carl Graham Two recent polls on federal versus state lands management preferences have seemingly contradictory findings. In fact, they demonstrate one key point: The more people know about the costs and benefits of transferring federal lands to state control, the more they tend to endorse it. A Center for American Progress poll released late last week claimed that ...